Reference Material OxM16
Recommended Values and 95% Confidence
Intervals
Gold concentration: 15.15 (+/- 0.13) µg/g
Silver concentration: 15.53 (+/- 0.46) µg/g
The above values apply only to product in jars or sachets
which have an identification number within the following
range: (The unique number range is not published on
website)
|
Prepared and Certified By: |
Malcolm Smith BSc, FNZIC
Malcolm Smith Reference Materials Ltd
2 Morriggia Place
Auckland 10
NEW ZEALAND
Telephone: +64 9 444 3534
Telefax: +64 9 444 7739
Email: mgs@xtra.co.nz |
|
Date of Certification: |
23 May 2001 |
|
Certificate Status: |
Original |
|
Available Packaging: |
This reference material has been packed in wide-mouthed
jars that contain 2.5kg of product. The contents
of some jars may be subsequently repacked into sealed
polyethylene sachets. |
|
Origin of Reference Material: |
Sodium feldspar with minor quantities of gold and
silver-bearing quartz.The quartz has been finely
ground and screened to ensure there is no nugget
effect. |
|
Supplier of Reference Material: |
ROCKLABS Ltd
P O Box 18 142
Auckland
NEW ZEALAND
Email: rocklabs@clear.net.nz
Telephone: +64 9 634 7696
Telefax: +64 9 634 6896 |
|
Description: |
The component minerals have been well mixed and
a homogeneity test carried out after the entire batch
was packaged into wide-mouthed jars to ascertain
that the gold is evenly distributed throughout the
reference material. There is no soil component. The
product contains crystalline quartz and therefore
dust from it should not be inhaled. |
| |
The approximate chemical composition is:
(Uncertified Values) |
| |
% |
|
SiO2 |
72.74 |
|
Al2O3 |
16.14 |
|
Na2O |
9.02 |
|
K2O |
0.30 |
|
CaO |
0.59 |
|
MgO |
0.06 |
|
TiO2 |
0.06 |
|
MnO |
0.01 |
|
P2O5 |
0.14 |
|
Fe2O3 |
0.47 |
|
L O I |
0.39 |
|
Intended Use: |
This reference material is designed to be included
with every batch of samples analysed and the results
plotted for quality monitoring purposes. |
|
Stability: |
The container (jar or sachet) and its contents
should not be heated to temperatures higher than
50 °C. The reference material is stable,
with weight changes of less than 0.5% at extremes
of naturally occurring temperature and humidity conditions. |
|
Instructions for Use: |
Weigh out quantity usually used for analysis and
analyze for total gold (and/or silver) by normal
procedure. Homogeneity testing has shown that
consistent results are obtainable for gold when 30g
portions are taken for analysis. Homogeneity
cannot be guaranteed for gold if smaller weights
are taken for analysis. |
|
Method of Preparation: |
Pulverized sodium feldspar was blended with finely
pulverized and screened gold and silver-containing
quartz. Once the powders were uniformly mixed
the composite was placed into 792 wide-mouthed jars,
each bearing a unique number. 30 jars were
randomly selected from the packaging run and material
from these jars was used for both homogeneity and
consensus testing. |
Homogeneity Test: 30g portions were selected as
follows for homogeneity testing for gold by an independent
laboratory.
Between Jar - Samples from the top of each of
the 30 randomly selected jars.
Within Jar - The contents of three jars were compacted
by vibration (to simulate the effect of freighting) and
five samples removed successively from top to bottom from
each of the three jars.
Reference Group - 12 homogeneous sub-samples (ie
a control group) were prepared from one jar by taking approximately
400g and mixing by mat rolling, followed by coning and
quartering to obtain 30g (approximate) portions for analysis.
Statistical analysis of the data indicated no significant
difference in variability between the Reference Group and
each of the other groups of samples at the 0.05 level of
significance. As the homogeneity test was carried
out using 30g analytical portions, the same degree of homogeneity
cannot be guaranteed if smaller weights are taken for analysis.
Analytical Methodology:
Once homogeneity had been established, two sub-samples
were submitted to a number of well-recognized laboratories
in order to assign gold and silver values by consensus
testing. The sub-samples were drawn from the 30 randomly
selected jars and each laboratory received samples from
two different jars. Indicative concentration ranges
were given. One laboratory used neutron activation
and the remainder used fire assay for gold analysis. Most
laboratories used an acid digest/instrumental detection
procedure for silver.
Calculation of Certified Values:
Results for gold were returned from 24 laboratories and
for silver, 23 laboratories. Statistical analysis
to identify outliers was carried out using the principles
detailed in sections 7.3.2 7.3.4, ISO 5725-2: 1994. Assessment
of each laboratorys performance was carried out on
the basis of z-scores, partly based on the concept described
in ISO/IEC Guide 43-1. Details of the criteria used
in this examination are available on request. As
a result of these statistical analyses, two sets of results
were excluded for the purpose of assigning gold and silver
concentration values to this reference material. Recommended
values were thus calculated from the average of the remaining
n=22 sets of replicate results for gold and n=21 replicate
sets of results for silver. The 95% confidence interval
on each average was estimated using the formula:-
(where X is the estimated average, s is the estimated
standard deviation of the laboratory averages, and t is
the 0.025 tail-value from Students t-distribution
with n-1 degrees of freedom). The recommended values
are provided at the beginning of the certificate in µg/g
(ppm) units. A summary of the results used to calculate
the recommended values is listed below and the names of
the laboratories that submitted results are also listed
below.
Legal Notice:
This certificate and the reference material described
in it have been prepared with due care and attention. However
ROCKLABS Ltd, Malcolm Smith Reference Materials Ltd and
Tim Ball Ltd accept no liability for any decisions or actions
taken following the use of the reference material.
|
Summary of Results
Used to Calculate Gold and Silver Values
(not related to order of laboratories listed below) |
Statistical analysis of both homogeneity and consensus
test results has been carried out by an independent statistician.
Participating Laboratories
Australia
Amdel Laboratories Ltd, Perth
Amdel Laboratories Ltd, Adelaide
Analabs Pty Ltd, Perth
Analabs Pty Ltd, Townsville
Becquerel Laboratories, Lucas Heights
Genalysis Laboratory Services Pty Ltd, Perth
Standard and Reference Laboratories, Perth
Brazil
Lakefield Geosol Limitada
Canada
ALS Chemex, British Columbia
Acme Analytical Laboratories Ltd, British Columbia
Activation Laboratories Ltd, Ontario
Bondar Clegg, British Columbia
Chimitec Bondar Clegg, Quebec
Bourlamaque Assay Laboratories Ltd, Quebec
Lakefield Research Limited, Ontario
XRAL Laboratories, A Division of SGS Canada Inc, Ontario
New Zealand
Amdel New Zealand Ltd, Otago
SGS New Zealand Ltd, Waihi
South Africa
Anglo American Research Laboratories (Pty) Ltd
Anglogold, West Wits Operations
Lakefield Research Africa (Pty) Ltd
Mintek, Analytical Science Division
United States of America
ALS Chemex, Nevada
Barrick Goldstrike Mines Inc, Nevada
Newmont Mining Corporation, Nevada
References:
For further information on the preparation and validation
of this reference material please
contact Malcolm Smith.
|
Certifying Officer |
Independent Statistician |
|
M G Smith BSc, FNZIC |
Tim Ball BSc (Hons)
|